I have a 10,000 gallon kidney shaped pool. Shallow side is 3.5 feet deep. Deep side is 6 feet deep. The bottom isn't flat and it curves up on the sides from bottom to top.I'm experienced with maintaining a pool. I have a System 3 diatomaceous earth filter that has 53 sq ft of filter space. Run the pump 12 hours a day at 2200rpm to achieve balance between energy usage and turning the pool over (happens about every 3 hours according to the math).I loath hauling out my pole, sweeper, filter canister, and connecting all of this to the pump via the skimmer to vacuum the floor and sides of my pool. Take too long, too many nuances. Been doing it this way for decades. I figured technology could make it easier for me. Aside - I don't use an auto vacuum since I have dogs that swim all the time. Don't want them to catch a hose and drown.The main things that litter my floor are dog hair, sand / crushed granite from nearby paths, material from the roof of my house, leaves from many trees, and DE powder from when I spray the filters after vacuuming (backs out thru the line).I grew up swimming in creeks so having a perfectly clean pool isn't my goal. I just know I need to clean it from time to time in order to keep algae from forming. In general, I keep my DE filter clean by back washing once a month, I vacuum the floor about once a month, and I skim weekly.I finally decided to try one of the automated, cordless vacuums. These are the ones I tried.POOL BLASTER Max CG, $299https://www.amazon.com/dp/B002L61OGAPaxcess Cordless Robotic Cleaner, $318.09https://www.amazon.com/dp/B088JWRWGMAIPER Cordless Automatic Pool Cleaner, $876.81https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09KY211BPWinner was the Pool Blaster.Paxess- Filter screen is about 180µm which wasn't able to catch all the DE (DE is generally less than 100µm in size). The unit blew much of the DE back into the water. It did filter some.- Wasn't strong enough to climb up from my deep end so it remained in the deep end.- I felt the Paxess performed better than the Aiper in my pool. Might not for yours.- Charging was easy. Battery worked fine. Lasted about an hour.Aiper- Filter screen was much too big. Couldn't catch DE nor sand. Manufacturer didn't disclose size of filter. Blew debris right back into pool.- Unit claims to climb up walls. Mine didn't. It would attempt to climb it, back flip, then try again...over and over as it worked around the pool. Very odd behavior.- Charging was easy. Battery worked fine. Lasted about an hour.Pool Blaster Max CG- I really like this tool. It's different than the robots. It's a self contained, battery operated, cordless device. But, you attach it to the end of your pole.- I'm used to using a pole to work on my pool and I like the exercise of using my legs, arms, and core.- So, this tool really spoke to me.- Comes with 2 filters: one for general debris and one for super fine stuff like DE. The DE one is excellent! It captured all of my DE. However, I had to empty it after every length of the pool (short length of about 6 feet). I had to empty it about 30 times in order to clean all the DE off the entire bottom of my pool. This sucked (- So, I modified my approach. I turned up my pool motor to max RPM and scrubbed the pool to get the DE in solution. Then the next day I vacuumed with the general filter. This seemed to greatly help but it wasn't perfect.- So, I reset my expectations and my process. The next time I sprayed the filters in my DE bubble, I emptied the bubble into my sewer line of my house (very easy and fast for me to do). I don't run backwash / pool water waste to my yard because the chlorinated water damages my trees and vegetation. Then, I capped my line that goes back to my pool. Spray quickly. Then reassemble and I'm done.- Now, when I use the Pool Blaster, I can use the general filter basket and I can vacuum the whole pool in 30 min. Doing it the old way with the hose, vacuum head, canister, etc used to take 2 hours because of how many times I had to stop and tend to the nuances. I also had to backwash / clean the filters in the DE bubble to avoid algae building up in the bubble- Emptying the filter of the pool blaster is super fast. Take me less than 2 min. I shake it out into a bucket, then I rub it while dunking it into the skimmer. Then back to work.Suggestion to Pool BlasterIf they had a filter that was in between the size of the fine one and the general one, it'd be even better.Overall, I'm happy with the Pool Blaster.I'm happy that the time to done is 30 min vs 2 hours. And, I don't have to clean my DE filter after vacuuming the pool to avoid algae building up in the DE canister. The Pool Blaster is a completely separate tool which means my DE filter remains untouched and hence I don't have to clean it every time. We live in a hot, humid environment so fighting algae is always a thing. Giving 5 stars since my use case might be odd.

The media could not be loaded.

Charged easily, and worked well out of the box. Simple to assemble and operate. Works fine on standard pool debris.Unfortunately, despite the 'commercial grade' certification and the inclusion of an 'ultra-fine' filter bag, the product completely failed to deal with the mustard algae residue that was the prime reason for my AUD$1000 purchase.Use on such algae simply resulted in brown clouds spewing from the exhaust vent.Got the pool professionally cleaned for $99 instead....

...die damit beginnt dass ich ein Gerät mit einem Stecker für den angloamerikanischen Raum bekommen habe. Zwar ist ein Austausch-Stecker beigefügt, es erfordert jedoch handwerkliches Geschick, diesen dann auch umzubauen. Nicht erklärt wird in der beigefügten Schnellanleitung wie man den Filterhalter aufsetzt - auch das muss man herausfinden. Was sich der Hersteller beim Anschluss des Ladekabels gedacht hat steht in den Sternen, der Stecker wird mittels eines bizarren Druckverschlusses aufgesetzt, was etwas Geduld und ebenfalls Fingerspitzengefühl erfordert. Warum nicht eine einfache Steckerlösung wie z.B. auch bei den akkubetriebenen Poolrobotern? Also, ich hatte bei diesem Preis „plug and play" erwartet aber das schaut leider anders aus. Dito auch beim Aufstecken auf die Saugstange (nicht im Paket dabei), ohne Hakelei geht nix.Nun aber: Fünf Sterne und sogar der Gedanke, ein Zweitgerät anzuschaffen. Warum? Im Einsatz macht der Poolblaster seinem Namen tatsächlich alle Ehre. Nach drei Wochen ohne Reinigung, nur mit Einsatz von Flockungsmitteln, war der Poolboden -Maße: Länge 12,5 m, Breite 5 m, Tiefe 1,55 m- ein Schlachtfeld. Binnen einer Stunde räumte der Blaster zumindest so auf dass es bei der zweiten Runde dann komplett sauber werden wird. Das schafft kein Poolroboter, zumal ich noch Mikrofilter dazu bestellt hatte, die auch Geflocktes aufsaugen - unbedingt ratsam - und sich mühelos auswaschen, d.h., mehrfach vewrenden lassen. Dank der Form des Saugers komme ich mühelos in alle Ecken - auch da steigt der Poolroboter aus. Die Laufzeit ist ordentlich, in einer Stunde kann ich etwas bewirken. Fazit: Hakelei, dann aber tolle Leistung.

Ottimo prodotto che sostituisce in meglio il robot per la piscinaLo uso per una piscina interrata di 10x5L''unico punto che non mi soddisfa alla grande è l'adattatore di cui è dotato per la ricarica

A little expensive but works great cleans our 16 by 34 ft inground pool in a few min.Husband loves not having to get his big one out all the time.ontario canada

pour les livraisons on devrait pouvoir choisir les heures bureau